The latest American bombardment in Venezuela and the detention of its president have sparked apprehension regarding Washington's designs on the Arctic territory. Supporters of the former president's base have allegedly turned their attention to the resource-rich landmass in the wake of the events in South America.
Merely a short time following the start of the Venezuelan operation, a well-known right-wing commentator, who is married to a senior White House adviser, shared a symbolic image. The picture showed Greenland draped with the stars and stripes, with the single-word caption: "SOON."
This overt threat to claim the resource-abundant region, which is a part of the NATO alliance, triggered immediate and firm condemnation from Danish officials.
"Denmark and the US are close allies and should keep work together as such. US security is also Greenland’s and our security," stated the Danish ambassador to the United States. "The Kingdom of Denmark and the US collaborate to ensure security in the Arctic."
The ambassador further pointed out that Denmark had substantially increased its military budget recently, allocating a substantial sum specifically for Northern and regional security. "Furthermore, we expect complete respect for the sovereign borders of the Kingdom of Denmark," he emphasized.
The tensions were additionally complicated by the previous appointment of a US state governor as a representative to Greenland. The appointee had openly expressed gratitude to the commander-in-chief, stating it was an "privilege" to work in a volunteer capacity to "bring Greenland into the US."
Following the events in Venezuela, this envoy praised the president's decisive move, linking it to the wider "fight against narcotics."
Since assuming office, the US president has consistently alarmed European allies with his expressed desire in Greenland. The island is viewed as critically strategic for national security and future mineral exploitation. It already houses the northernmost US military base.
In a notable media appearance, the leader refused to exclude the resorting to military force to acquire Greenland. This stance comes during intensifying global competition in the Arctic. "I don't rule it out. I don't say I'm going to do it, but I don't rule out anything... We need Greenland very badly," he stated.
He described Greenland as having a "tiny amount of people, which we’ll look after, and we’ll cherish them... But we need that for global security."
In reaction to this persistent "rhetoric" of intent, Danish intelligence service took the unprecedented step last month of labelling the United States as a "potential threat."
The leaders of both Greenland issued a unified and stern rebuke: "We have said it very clearly before. Now we say it again... You must not take over other countries."
Public opinion in Greenland reveals a complex sentiment. While a overwhelming percentage of the island's residents seek independence from Denmark, there is also scant appetite to become part of the United States. The territory has had the legal right to seek sovereignty for many years.
Some analysts are now re-evaluating the possibility of such a action. One policy director focusing in military analysis admitted she had once discounted the sabre-rattling but was "currently not so sure."
"Logistically, it would be feasible for the US to deploy a few hundred or a few thousand troops inside of Greenland, and it's not clear to me which power could do anything about it," she observed.